We obtained 2666 teenagers (46.8%) belonging to the basic category (suggest years a dozen.6 decades; SD 0.89) and you will 3031 (53.2%) from the 2nd class (indicate age 15.five years; SD 0.90) .
Inside the younger group, the new suggest Bmi was (SD step 3.12), during older class Bmi mean was (SD 2.75).
Guys one of them sample (n=2671), got good Bmi imply away from 20.step one (SD step three.03), with a suggest chronilogical age of age (SD step 1.70), when you’re ladies (n=3026), had an excellent Bmi indicate out-of 20.dos (SD 2.95), having an indicate chronilogical age of (SD step one.67) .
Body mass index, heavy and you will obesity
Regarding total 5697 kids included in the test, 89 (step one.6%) have been classified as over weight. There are a great deal more heavy lady (51.7%) weighed against men (48.3%). What amount of teenagers categorized given that over weight is 822 (fourteen.4%). There are a whole lot more heavy people (53.5%) compared to ladies (46.5%). Over weight are more common certainly one of men than just certainly female [? 2 (1)=; P 2 (1)=; P 2 (1)=; P table step three).
Exercise
You will find a distinction anywhere between obese and you will non-over weight (n=5566; t=step 1.977; P dos (1)=0.565; P=0.452] and you may heavy [? dos (1)=0.687; P=0.407] kids, in contrast to other shot.
Slimming down actions
Particular (7.3%) from kids said becoming towards diet plan to shed, if you’re twenty-two.3% reported not towards the diet plan however, which they must lose weight. Female advertised dieting over guys (25.3% out of males and you may 74.7% from ladies) [? 2 (1)=; P dos (2)=; P 2 (1)=; P dos (1)=; P dos (1)=0.625; P=0.429]. In contrast, you will find a mathematically factor within number of personal family and fat: 75% out of non-obese claimed with two or more friends and you can 71.2% off fat [? 2 (1)=5.24; P=0.022].
Interested in the nearest and dearest
Particular 87.7% of your toddlers advertised they are no problem finding new nearest and dearest. It had been more complicated while making family members for over weight [? dos (1)=; P 2 (1)=; P dos (1)=; P 2 (3)=; P 2 (3)=; P 2 (3)=; P 16 ). Brand new 7-part scale is actually categorized on the about three organizations (narrow, average and obese). A team of 254 toddlers (cuatro.7%) thought themselves ‘thin’; of those, 67.3% was women, 85.4% belonged towards the old category and you can 98.8% considered by themselves since not-being heavy. Them experienced themselves since the not being over weight. About class just who considered by themselves ‘average’, 4948 young ones (90.8%) was basically integrated; of these, 53.7% had been female, 53.0% belonged to your earlier classification, 87.7% thought on their own since the not-being overweight and you can 99.1% believed themselves since the not being heavy. From the classification exactly who thought by themselves ‘overweight’, 250 kids (4.6%) was included; http://www.datingmentor.org/pl/mamba-recenzja of them, 59.6% was basically women, sixty.4% belong to the younger classification, 68% felt on their own as actually fat and you can sixteen.8% felt by themselves to be fat. The fresh new mean Bmi of these whom known on their own as narrow to your the image try (SD 2.14), on the mediocre communities was (SD dos.78), as well as this new over weight class is (SD step three.84).
Usually the one-means ANOVA and you may Scheffe’s post hoc shot of these classes inside brand new impact off human body picture (slim, average otherwise obese) displayed statistically tall differences in Body mass index [F(dos,5449)=; P 2 (1)=391.1; P=0.000].
Which same you to-ways ANOVA and you may Scheffe’s blog post hoc sample for these categories when you look at the impact out-of looks image (narrow, average otherwise obese) together with displayed mathematically tall distinctions to have ages. The greater regular identification out of a obese picture since the exactly like own physique is actually so much more constant within the younger young ones [F(dos,5449)=; P dos =0.349). All of these details had been notably of the recognized human anatomy visualize, except intercourse. Bmi, diet behavior and you can appearance was undoubtedly related. Age are adversely associated ( desk 4).